Beskrivelse
In this abstract, we will present a project connected to the field of ‘at risk youth’. The project is preoccupied with participation and sustainability on different levels. Firstly, the project will create knowledge on how to generate participatory processes for ‘at risk youth’. Secondly, the project will create knowledge on how professionals can work with participatory processes and thirdly the project will work on how to incorporate this participatory work forms into a structural level. In the project, there is a specific concept of participation at stake, which we call ‘Upturned participation’ (Nielsen and Nielsen 1997, see methodology). Upturned participation is a specific concept, which we strive to bring into a structural framing of the institutions general work and efforts with at risk youth. We are taking into account, that research shows that participation has become an inherent part of the global political rhetoric, and participative methods has become part of a huge industry within the management sector and consultancy work. This development has in some ways disconnected participation from the democratic agenda, which was an important part of both the Salamanca statement and the Convention on the Wrights of Persons with Dissablities (2006/2010). Putting forward the concept of upturned participation, is a way to connect once again to the notion of democracy and bringing it once again into welfare state strategy and the efforts connected to this?Periode | 23 aug. 2017 |
---|---|
Begivenhedstitel | ECER 2017: Reforming Education and the Imperative of Constant Change: Ambivalent roles of policy and educational research |
Begivenhedstype | Konference |
Placering | København, DanmarkVis på kort |
Emneord
- Undersøgelsesdesign, teori og metode
- deltagelse
- Socialt arbejde og sociale forhold
Dokumenter og Links
Relateret indhold
-
Publikationer
-
Participation and institutional Change: within the field of social work with 'at risk youth
Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskrift › Abstrakt › Forskning › peer review