Advancing 'real-world' trials that take account of social context and human volition

Anders Blædel Gottlieb Hansen, Allan Jones

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftsartikelForskningpeer review

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: The recent paper in Trials by Porter and colleagues highlights the utility of applying a critical realism approach in randomised trials, an approach central to the Medical Research Council's (MRC) Framework for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Healthcare Interventions. The MRC framework offers a pragmatic step towards a more open systems approach that bridges randomised evaluation with social context and human agency in an effort to improve the generalisability of trial outcomes.

    MAIN BODY: The MRC framework has contributed to the proliferation of a more open systems approach in health research; however, the broader acceptance of the realist approach to health research does not seem to be emulated by norms in research fund allocation, which largely prioritises laboratory-based research.

    CONCLUSION: This commentary is simply a plea, to those who make the strategic decisions regarding allocation of research funding, to support all phases of health intervention research in complex systems that contribute to the development of effective, translational and sustainable interventions in the promotion of health.

    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Artikelnummer531
    TidsskriftTrials
    Vol/bind18
    Udgave nummer1
    Sider (fra-til)531
    ISSN1745-6215
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 10 nov. 2017

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Advancing 'real-world' trials that take account of social context and human volition'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater