Asking how as a next step in avoiding dualistic perspectives on occupation: A response to Aldrich and Cutchin

Jacob Østergaard Madsen, Staffan Josephsson

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftsartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

In their article “Filling in the gaps: A case for enhancing Madsen and
Josephsson’s assertions about occupation, situation, and inquiry”, Aldrich
and Cutchin (2017) responded to our article “Engagement in occupation as
an inquiring process: Exploring the situatedness of occupation” with the
ambition to enhance our assertions on occupation. In this reply, we argue
that their text does not address the main arguments of our article. We
further argue that their response confirms that further steps in exploring
the situatedness of occupation by asking how situation and occupation are
related is a necessary step in avoiding dualistic perspectives on occupation.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Occupational Science
Vol/bind24
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)430-433
Antal sider4
ISSN1442-7591
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Emneord

  • ergoterapi

Citationsformater