Comparative spectroscopic and rheological studies on crude and purified soluble barley and oat beta-glucan preparations

  • Mette S. Mikkelsen
  • , Birthe M. Jespersen
  • , Birger L. Moller
  • , Helle N. Laerke
  • , Flemming H. Larsen
  • , Soren B. Engelsen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftsartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

The rheology of crude and purified barley (BBG) and oat (OBG) β-glucan samples were characterized. Sample content and major impurities was characterized by Fourier-transform near infrared Raman and infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy revealing substantial differences between the β-glucan samples. The purification procedure increased the β-glucan content from 66.7 to 82.4% and from 30.1 to 68.4% for BBG and OBG, respectively. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) analysis was applied to estimate the β-(1 → 3) to β-(1 → 4) linkage ratio of the β-glucans. The molar mass of BBG and OBG was determined by high performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) using β-glucan standards and was found to be 126 and 355 kDa, respectively.

The viscosity of crude and purified β-glucans was studied at various concentrations (2.5, 5% w/v), temperatures (10–80 °C) and shear rates (1–100 s− 1). BBG was characterized as a low-viscosity β-glucan with Newtonian flow behavior while OBG was characterized as a high-viscosity β-glucan with shear thinning flow behavior. At equivalent β-glucan concentration in solutions the viscosity for OBG was found to be ~ 100 fold higher than for BBG. A direct viscosity dependence on exact β-glucan content regardless of amount and composition of α-glucan impurities was found for both OBG and BBG. This study suggests that the structural characteristics of the β-glucan polymers such as molar mass are of greater functional importance than the presence of lager amounts of starch/α-dextrins as long as the β-glucan samples are compared at equivalent β-glucan doses.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftFood Research International
Sider (fra-til)2417-2424
ISSN0963-9969
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2010
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citationsformater