Et systematisk review af pålideligheden og validiteten af spørgeskema om styrker og vanskeligheder med særlig fokus på dens anvendelse blandt anbragte børn

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftsartikelForskningpeer review

    Abstract

    Purpose: A systematic review was conducted to analyze the inter-rater
    reliability, cross-informant consistency, test-retest reliability, and temporal
    stability of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ),
    and its ability to discriminate.
    Method: We searched three databases for articles about the SDQ
    (parent, teacher, and self-report version), used samples of children
    up to age 18 and reported inter-rater reliability, cross-informant reliability,
    test-retest reliability, temporal stability, specificity, sensitivity,
    positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
    Results: Focusing on the TDS, inter-rater, and cross-informant reliability
    showed acceptable values, but respondent types (e.g., mothers
    and fathers) are not interchangeable. Test-retest reliability and temporal
    stability were also acceptable, and not excessively high.
    Specificity and NPV were acceptable but not sensitivity and PPV.
    Discussion and Conclusion: Greater transparency is needed about
    who the respondent is when the term “parents” is used. The SDQ is an
    important supplement to service-as-usual assessments by social care
    professionals.
    Bidragets oversatte titelEt systematisk review af pålideligheden og validiteten af spørgeskema om styrker og vanskeligheder med særlig fokus på dens anvendelse blandt anbragte børn
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftJournal of Evidence-Based Social Work
    Vol/bind18
    Udgave nummer1
    Sider (fra-til)1-31
    Antal sider31
    ISSN1543-3714
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - jan. 2021

    Emneord

    • Kliniske undersøgelsesmetoder, laboratorieteknologi og radiografi

    Citationsformater