Forms of Knowledge Incorporated in Clinical Decision-making among Newly-Graduated Nurses: A Metasynthesis

Siri Voldbjerg, Erik Elgaard Sørensen, Elisabeth Hall

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftAbstraktForskning

Abstract

Clinical-decision-making is of decisive importance to how evidence-based practice is put into practice. Schools of Nursing have a responsibility to teach and train nursing students to make clinical decisions within a frame of evidence-based practice. Clinical decision-making among nurses has been explored from numerous angles using a diversity of methodologies. Existing research has mainly focused on promoting and inhibiting factors for implementation of evidence-based practice and incorporation of research evidence in the clinical-decision. Little attention has been given to the nurses' behavior, including the knowledge that actually informs the newly graduated nurses’ clinical decision. The aim of the study is to combine and synthesize results from qualitative research. Noblit and Hare’s meta-ethnographic approach is used to conduct a metasynthesis of qualitative research that has studied the knowledge that informs clinical decision-making among newly-graduated nurses. Qualitative studies were retrieved from CINAHL, PubMed, SCOPE, ERIC and GOOGLE-Scholar and subsequently selected by pre-defined inclusion criteria and critically appraised using CASP. Metaphors identified in the analytical process will contribute to theory development and have implications for clinical and educational practice regarding the professional development of clinical decision making within a frame of evidence-based practice. The presentation highlights the main findings from the metasynthesis and provides perspectives on future research within clinical decision-making among newly-graduated nurses.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2013
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Citationsformater