TY - JOUR
T1 - From Morality to Pathology: A Brief Historization of Contemporary Western Grief Practices and Understandings
T2 - A brief historization of contemporary Western grief practices and understandings
AU - Holte Kofod, Ester
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 The Editors of Nordic Psychology.
PY - 2017/1/2
Y1 - 2017/1/2
N2 - In this paper, I present three ideal typical grief articulations drawn from three historical periods: (1) grief as a moral practice in Ancient Greek virtue ethics, (2) grief as an expression of an inner, authentic morality in the Romantic era, and (3) grief as a psychologized and increasingly pathologized phenomenon in modern psychology up to the present attempts to include separate diagnoses for pathological grief in the diagnostic manuals for mental disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; World Health Organization, 2016). The purpose of this presentation is to shed light on current taken-for-granted notions of grief, and, by providing some historical background, challenge prevailing understandings that depict grief as an ahistorical, universal, intra-psychological and (potentially) medical condition that is analytically separate from historical, social, cultural, and religious practices. Informed by a cultural psychological outlook (Brinkmann, 2016; Valsiner, 2014), I argue that the relationship between grieving individuals and their cultures is dialectical, mutually constituting and inherently normative, and hence, that the diagnostic approach to grief as an individual, causal reaction to loss is flawed. On this background, I argue that an acknowledgment of the inherent normativity of grief (as presented by the historical accounts) can potentially inform and enrich contemporary understandings and practices related to bereavement, ultimately to the benefit of people who suffer from grief.
AB - In this paper, I present three ideal typical grief articulations drawn from three historical periods: (1) grief as a moral practice in Ancient Greek virtue ethics, (2) grief as an expression of an inner, authentic morality in the Romantic era, and (3) grief as a psychologized and increasingly pathologized phenomenon in modern psychology up to the present attempts to include separate diagnoses for pathological grief in the diagnostic manuals for mental disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; World Health Organization, 2016). The purpose of this presentation is to shed light on current taken-for-granted notions of grief, and, by providing some historical background, challenge prevailing understandings that depict grief as an ahistorical, universal, intra-psychological and (potentially) medical condition that is analytically separate from historical, social, cultural, and religious practices. Informed by a cultural psychological outlook (Brinkmann, 2016; Valsiner, 2014), I argue that the relationship between grieving individuals and their cultures is dialectical, mutually constituting and inherently normative, and hence, that the diagnostic approach to grief as an individual, causal reaction to loss is flawed. On this background, I argue that an acknowledgment of the inherent normativity of grief (as presented by the historical accounts) can potentially inform and enrich contemporary understandings and practices related to bereavement, ultimately to the benefit of people who suffer from grief.
KW - grief
KW - kulturanalyse
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85008414684
U2 - 10.1080/19012276.2016.1267914
DO - 10.1080/19012276.2016.1267914
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1901-2276
VL - 69
SP - 47
EP - 60
JO - Nordic Psychology
JF - Nordic Psychology
IS - 1
ER -