TY - GEN
T1 - How much running is too much? A new take on injury risk for runners
AU - Ramskov, Daniel
AU - Schuster Brandt Frandsen, Jesper
AU - Hulme, Adam
AU - Parner, Erik Thorlund
AU - Møller, Merete
AU - Lindman, Ida
AU - Abrahamson, Josefin
AU - Sjørup Simonsen, Nina
AU - Sandell Jacobsen, Julie
AU - Skejø, Sebastian
AU - Malisoux, Laurent
AU - Lejbach Bertelsen, Michael
AU - Nielsen, Rasmus Østergaard
PY - 2025/10/6
Y1 - 2025/10/6
N2 - Why is this study important?
Running continues to grow in popularity worldwide—celebrated for its health benefits and accessibility. Although it also comes with a downside: the risk of injuries. Up to half of all runners report an injury each year, many of them overuse-related. Traditionally, clinicians and coaches have focused on gradual increases in weekly mileage and workload ratios (like the acute:chronic workload ratio, or ACWR) to reduce injury risk.
However, these traditional approaches are overlooking something crucial. Despite widespread use in science and wearable technology, these weekly-based calculations may not accurately reflect the moment-to-moment load decisions runners actually make. In practice, injuries may strike more “suddenly” for instance after a single ill-judged running session that is longer than usual. Equipped with this novel hypothesis, the present study offers a paradigm-shift by focusing on single-session spikes in running distance, rather than week-to-week trends.
AB - Why is this study important?
Running continues to grow in popularity worldwide—celebrated for its health benefits and accessibility. Although it also comes with a downside: the risk of injuries. Up to half of all runners report an injury each year, many of them overuse-related. Traditionally, clinicians and coaches have focused on gradual increases in weekly mileage and workload ratios (like the acute:chronic workload ratio, or ACWR) to reduce injury risk.
However, these traditional approaches are overlooking something crucial. Despite widespread use in science and wearable technology, these weekly-based calculations may not accurately reflect the moment-to-moment load decisions runners actually make. In practice, injuries may strike more “suddenly” for instance after a single ill-judged running session that is longer than usual. Equipped with this novel hypothesis, the present study offers a paradigm-shift by focusing on single-session spikes in running distance, rather than week-to-week trends.
M3 - Contribution to digital media
ER -