@inbook{de23f56e94d94528a3b6650632e359f8,
title = "Response-dependence and Conditional Fallacy Problems",
abstract = "Response-dependence theses seem vulnerable to conditional fallacy problems like those that afflict the simple conditional analysis of dispositions. This paper is an attempt to clear response-dependence theses of these charges. I discuss what the counterexamples show, and how they might be resisted. I consider three suggested solutions from the literature on response-dependence: Johnston{\textquoteright}s construal of response-dependence theses in explicitly dispositional terms, Blackburn{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}elasticity{\textquoteright} approach, and Wright{\textquoteright}s provisional equations. I develop a fourth strategy based on relativisation of the {\textquoteleft}favourable conditions{\textquoteright} that play a central role in response-dependence theses. I also table, but do not discuss in detail, a fifth suggestion inspired by Lewis{\textquoteright}s revised conditional analysis of dispositions. I conclude that the resources can be found to defend response-dependence theses against conditional fallacy problems",
keywords = "research designs, theory and method, conditional fallacy, response-dependence",
author = "Gundersen, \{Eline Busck\}",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783884051054",
series = "Basic Philosophical Concepts Series",
publisher = "Philosophia Verlag",
pages = "369--392",
editor = "Miguel Hoeltje and Benjamin Schnieder and Alex Steinberg",
booktitle = "Varieties of dependence",
address = "Germany",
}