TY - JOUR
T1 - The association between having assistive devices and activities of daily living ability and health-related quality of life: An exploratory cross-sectional study among people with advanced cancer
T2 - Advanced cancer and use of assistive devices
AU - Funch, Anja
AU - Kruse, Naja Benigna
AU - la Cour, Karen
AU - Peoples, Hanne
AU - Wæhrens, Eva Ejlersen
AU - Brandt, Åse
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Abstract Objective To explore whether people with advanced cancer who had assistive devices had higher or lower ADL ability and/or HRQoL than people with advanced cancer who did not have assistive devices. Methods A cross‐sectional study of 164 participants with advanced cancer. Self‐reported ADL ability and HRQoL were assessed using the ADL—Interview and the EORTC QLQ‐C30. Data regarding assistive devices were collected using a study‐specific questionnaire. Data were analysed using multiple linear regression. The regression coefficients (B) were presented in crude form and adjusted for potential confounding variables (age, gender, cohabiting, receiving help, physical functioning, fatigue and pain). p‐Values (p) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Having assistive devices was associated with lower ADL ability (B = −0.923, p = <0.0001), but this association was not significant after adjustment where it was found that physical functioning was a confounder positively associated with ADL ability (B = 0.030, p = <0.0001). No significant association was found between having assistive devices and HRQoL. Both fatigue (B = −0.336, p = <0.0001) and pain (B = −0.124, p = 0.010) were negatively associated with HRQoL. Conclusion The participants had the same ADL ability and HRQoL regardless of them having assistive devices. Interventions addressing physical functioning or fatigue and pain might contribute to enhancing ADL ability and HRQoL among people with advanced cancer.
AB - Abstract Objective To explore whether people with advanced cancer who had assistive devices had higher or lower ADL ability and/or HRQoL than people with advanced cancer who did not have assistive devices. Methods A cross‐sectional study of 164 participants with advanced cancer. Self‐reported ADL ability and HRQoL were assessed using the ADL—Interview and the EORTC QLQ‐C30. Data regarding assistive devices were collected using a study‐specific questionnaire. Data were analysed using multiple linear regression. The regression coefficients (B) were presented in crude form and adjusted for potential confounding variables (age, gender, cohabiting, receiving help, physical functioning, fatigue and pain). p‐Values (p) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Having assistive devices was associated with lower ADL ability (B = −0.923, p = <0.0001), but this association was not significant after adjustment where it was found that physical functioning was a confounder positively associated with ADL ability (B = 0.030, p = <0.0001). No significant association was found between having assistive devices and HRQoL. Both fatigue (B = −0.336, p = <0.0001) and pain (B = −0.124, p = 0.010) were negatively associated with HRQoL. Conclusion The participants had the same ADL ability and HRQoL regardless of them having assistive devices. Interventions addressing physical functioning or fatigue and pain might contribute to enhancing ADL ability and HRQoL among people with advanced cancer.
KW - health, nutrition and quality of life
U2 - 10.1111/ecc.13002
DO - 10.1111/ecc.13002
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0961-5423
VL - 28
SP - e13002
JO - European Journal of Cancer Care
JF - European Journal of Cancer Care
IS - 3
ER -