TY - JOUR
T1 - The functional effect of segmental trunk and head control training in moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Curtis, Derek John
AU - Woollacott, Marjorie
AU - Bencke, Jesper
AU - Lauridsen, Hanne Bloch
AU - Saavedra, Sandy
AU - Bandholm, Thomas
AU - Sonne-Holm, Stig
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2018/2/17
Y1 - 2018/2/17
N2 - PURPOSE: To determine whether segmental training is more effective in improving gross motor function in children and young people with moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy than conventional physiotherapy.METHODS: Twenty-eight participants were randomized to a segmental training or control group. Outcomes were Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo), and postural sway at baseline, at primary endpoint (6 months), and at follow-up (12 months).RESULTS: There were no significant differences in either GMFM, PEDI, or SATCo scores at primary endpoint or follow-up. There were significant reductions in anterior-posterior head angular sway and trunk sway in the segmental training group at primary endpoint but not at follow-up.CONCLUSION: Segmental training was not superior to usual care in improving GMFM. Improvements in head and trunk sway were greater in the segmental training group at primary endpoint but not at follow-up.
AB - PURPOSE: To determine whether segmental training is more effective in improving gross motor function in children and young people with moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy than conventional physiotherapy.METHODS: Twenty-eight participants were randomized to a segmental training or control group. Outcomes were Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo), and postural sway at baseline, at primary endpoint (6 months), and at follow-up (12 months).RESULTS: There were no significant differences in either GMFM, PEDI, or SATCo scores at primary endpoint or follow-up. There were significant reductions in anterior-posterior head angular sway and trunk sway in the segmental training group at primary endpoint but not at follow-up.CONCLUSION: Segmental training was not superior to usual care in improving GMFM. Improvements in head and trunk sway were greater in the segmental training group at primary endpoint but not at follow-up.
KW - health, nutrition and quality of life
KW - disease, health science and nursing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85008173339
U2 - 10.1080/17518423.2016.1265603
DO - 10.1080/17518423.2016.1265603
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 28045553
SN - 1751-8423
VL - 21
SP - 91
EP - 100
JO - Developmental Neurorehabilitation
JF - Developmental Neurorehabilitation
IS - 2
ER -