TY - JOUR
T1 - The psychological effects of interventions targeting informal caregivers of patients with cardiovascular disease—a systematic review
AU - Risom, Signe Stelling
AU - Møller, Emma
AU - Wind, Gitte
AU - Prip, Anne
AU - Pii, Kathrine Hoffmann
AU - Hillersdal, Line
AU - Christoffersen, Nausheen
AU - Borregaard, Britt
AU - Bernholdt Rasmussen, Trine
AU - Christensen, Elise Harder
AU - Grew, Julie
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected]. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
PY - 2026/5
Y1 - 2026/5
N2 - Aims: To explore the psychological effects of interventions aimed at supporting informal caregivers involved in the care and treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods and results: Databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo) were searched for studies in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Inclusion criteria were: caregivers of patients with one or more cardiovascular diseases, patient and caregiver >18 years, caregivers included in the intervention, and, reporting of psychological outcomes specific to caregivers. Study designs were randomized controlled trials with a follow-up periods of >2 months. The RoB 2.0 bias assessment tool was used to assess risk of bias. Fifteen studies from nine countries were identified. Most interventions consisted of multiple components including educational face-to-face sessions, telephone support, and/or written resources. The analysis showed inconsistent results on caregiver outcomes, but significant improvements were reported in eight studies in at least one caregiver outcome. Analysis indicated that the studies providing more frequent contact with caregivers and patients were more likely to report significant improvements in caregiver outcomes. Risk of bias was judged as low in three studies, some concerns in nine studies, and as high in three studies. Conclusion: Due to inconsistency in results, this review yield uncertainty about whether interventions targeting caregivers of patients with cardiovascular disease improve caregivers’ psychological outcomes. Therefore, further research is needed to develop effective interventions for caregivers, as they play a vital role in the daily care and treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD420250654618.
AB - Aims: To explore the psychological effects of interventions aimed at supporting informal caregivers involved in the care and treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods and results: Databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo) were searched for studies in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Inclusion criteria were: caregivers of patients with one or more cardiovascular diseases, patient and caregiver >18 years, caregivers included in the intervention, and, reporting of psychological outcomes specific to caregivers. Study designs were randomized controlled trials with a follow-up periods of >2 months. The RoB 2.0 bias assessment tool was used to assess risk of bias. Fifteen studies from nine countries were identified. Most interventions consisted of multiple components including educational face-to-face sessions, telephone support, and/or written resources. The analysis showed inconsistent results on caregiver outcomes, but significant improvements were reported in eight studies in at least one caregiver outcome. Analysis indicated that the studies providing more frequent contact with caregivers and patients were more likely to report significant improvements in caregiver outcomes. Risk of bias was judged as low in three studies, some concerns in nine studies, and as high in three studies. Conclusion: Due to inconsistency in results, this review yield uncertainty about whether interventions targeting caregivers of patients with cardiovascular disease improve caregivers’ psychological outcomes. Therefore, further research is needed to develop effective interventions for caregivers, as they play a vital role in the daily care and treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD420250654618.
U2 - 10.1093/eurjcn/zvag049
DO - 10.1093/eurjcn/zvag049
M3 - Review article
SN - 1474-5151
VL - 25
SP - 665
EP - 685
JO - European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
JF - European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
IS - 4
ER -