Unfolding principles for student peer feedback: A comparative analysis across higher education contexts

Marianne Ellegaard, Martin Niss, Jesper Bruun, J. Lämsä, Frederik Voetmann Christiansen, Gry Green Linell, Camilla Fogh Larsen, Rimma Nyman, Bjørn Friis Johannsen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftsartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

six empirical examples of formative peer feedback in a set of international STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) contexts. By discussing how these different approaches to peer feedback unfold in practice, we aim to facilitate the bridging of the gap between theory and practice in implementing peer feedback in Higher Education. As a group of researchers and teaching practitioners from six Higher Education institutions, we discussed, analyzed, and synthesized practical examples of peer feedback in STEM that cover a breadth
of settings, aims, and forms. The analysis and comparison of these examples illustrate how principles in peer feedback emerge in practice. We discuss how the context in peer feedback influences its practical implementation, particularly with regard to its purpose and aims, the development and use of assessment criteria, and embedding and supporting the initiatives into the teaching and learning activities.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHögre utbildning
Vol/bind12
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)53-77
Antal sider25
ISSN2000-7558
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Unfolding principles for student peer feedback: A comparative analysis across higher education contexts'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater