TY - JOUR
T1 - What are the barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women?
T2 - A qualitative comparative analysis of stakeholder perspectives in seven European countries.
AU - Buus Bøje, Rikke
AU - Bardou, Marc
AU - Mensah, Keitly
AU - Rico Berrocal, Raquel
AU - Giordi Rossi, Paolo
AU - Bonvicini, Laura
AU - Auzzi, Noemi
AU - Taut, Diana
AU - Jiboc, Nicoleta
AU - Tisler, Anna
AU - Reintamm, Kerli
AU - Uusküla, Anneli
AU - Teixeira, Margarida
AU - Firmino-Machado, Joao
AU - Amorim, Mariana
AU - Lunet, Nuno
AU - Panyatov, Yulia
AU - Kotzeva, Tanya
AU - Mihaylova, Raya
AU - Andersen, Berit
AU - Kirkegaard, Pia
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to map and compare stakeholders' perceptions of barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women in seven European countries.
Design: In Collaborative User Boards, stakeholders were invited to participate to identify barriers towards participation in cervical cancer screening.
Setting: The study is nested in the EU-funded project CBIG-SCREEN which aims to tackle inequity in cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women (www.cbig-screen.eu). Data collection took place in Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania.
Participants: Participants represented micro-level stakeholders covering representatives of users, i.e. vulnerable women, meso-level stakeholders covering healthcare professionals and social workers, and macro-level stakeholders covering programme managers and decision-makers.
Methods: Across the seven countries, Twenty-five meetings with a duration of two hours took place between October 2021 and June 2022. The meetings were video- or audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English for a qualitative framework analysis.
Results: 123 participants took part in the. Collaborative User Boards. Context-specific barriers were related to different healthcare systems and characteristics of vulnerable populations. In Romania and Bulgaria, the lack of a continuous screening effort and of ways to identify eligible women were identified as barriers for all women rather than being specific for women in vulnerable situations. The participants in Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy and Portugal identified providers' lack of cultural and social sensitivity towards vulnerable women as barriers. In all countries, vulnerable women's fear, shame and lack of priority to preventive healthcare were identified as psychological barriers.
Conclusion: The study provides an overview of stakeholders' perceived barriers towards vulnerable women's cervical cancer screening participation in seven European countries. The organisation of healthcare systems and the maturity of screening programmes differ between countries, while vulnerable women's psychological barriers had several similarities.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to map and compare stakeholders' perceptions of barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women in seven European countries.
Design: In Collaborative User Boards, stakeholders were invited to participate to identify barriers towards participation in cervical cancer screening.
Setting: The study is nested in the EU-funded project CBIG-SCREEN which aims to tackle inequity in cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women (www.cbig-screen.eu). Data collection took place in Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania.
Participants: Participants represented micro-level stakeholders covering representatives of users, i.e. vulnerable women, meso-level stakeholders covering healthcare professionals and social workers, and macro-level stakeholders covering programme managers and decision-makers.
Methods: Across the seven countries, Twenty-five meetings with a duration of two hours took place between October 2021 and June 2022. The meetings were video- or audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English for a qualitative framework analysis.
Results: 123 participants took part in the. Collaborative User Boards. Context-specific barriers were related to different healthcare systems and characteristics of vulnerable populations. In Romania and Bulgaria, the lack of a continuous screening effort and of ways to identify eligible women were identified as barriers for all women rather than being specific for women in vulnerable situations. The participants in Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy and Portugal identified providers' lack of cultural and social sensitivity towards vulnerable women as barriers. In all countries, vulnerable women's fear, shame and lack of priority to preventive healthcare were identified as psychological barriers.
Conclusion: The study provides an overview of stakeholders' perceived barriers towards vulnerable women's cervical cancer screening participation in seven European countries. The organisation of healthcare systems and the maturity of screening programmes differ between countries, while vulnerable women's psychological barriers had several similarities.
KW - social work and social conditions
KW - disease, health science and nursing
KW - health, nutrition and quality of life
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079921
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079921
M3 - Journal article
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 5
M1 - e079921
ER -