What Means Wellbeing? Distinction of Two Discourses on Well-being – Conceptual and Theoretical Reflections

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftsartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

The article offers a new contribution to an existing discussion about well-being in defining the difference between a public health discourse and a pedagogical discourse, and the difference between a causal logical and a reflectivity paradigm, build on empirical informed theoretical analysis. The principal conclusion is: If efforts to promote well-being can be seen as a cross-professional responsibility, it is crucial that the relevant professionals meet across these well-being discourses, that children and young people’s well-being is viewed as a complex matter and challenge, and that professionals are challenged on their understanding, and capable of meeting different expectations, of well-being.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Psychiatry Research
Vol/bind4
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)1-9
ISSN2641-4317
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2021
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Discourses
  • Expectations
  • Exspectations
  • Pedagogy
  • Public Health
  • Public health
  • Reflecivity
  • Reflectivity
  • Trivsel
  • Well-being

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'What Means Wellbeing? Distinction of Two Discourses on Well-being – Conceptual and Theoretical Reflections'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater