Abstract
The article offers a new contribution to an existing discussion about well-being in defining the difference between a public health discourse and a pedagogical discourse, and the difference between a causal logical and a reflectivity paradigm, build on empirical informed theoretical analysis. The principal conclusion is: If efforts to promote well-being can be seen as a cross-professional responsibility, it is crucial that the relevant professionals meet across these well-being discourses, that children and young people’s well-being is viewed as a complex matter and challenge, and that professionals are challenged on their understanding, and capable of meeting different expectations, of well-being.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | International Journal of Psychiatry Research |
| Vol/bind | 4 |
| Udgave nummer | 3 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 1-9 |
| ISSN | 2641-4317 |
| Status | Udgivet - jun. 2021 |
| Udgivet eksternt | Ja |
Emneord
- Discourses
- Expectations
- Exspectations
- Pedagogy
- Public Health
- Public health
- Reflecivity
- Reflectivity
- Trivsel
- Well-being
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'What Means Wellbeing? Distinction of Two Discourses on Well-being – Conceptual and Theoretical Reflections'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver