Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Narrative Journey into the Borderland of Patient Safety: Toward an Expanded, Relational Concept of Safety

    • Roskilde University
    • Dialogisk Kommunikation
    • Region Sjælland
    • REkruttering og FAstholdelse af Sygeplejersker i somatikken og psykiatrien i Region Sjælland
    • Psykiatrien i Region Sjælland
    • MVU Forskningsstøtteenheden

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

    7 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    “Patient safety” is routinely defined in health services globally as “safety for patients against harm and risk of injury in health care.”
    (Danish Board of Quality in Health Care, 2022, p. 28; translated by the author). This is a standardized, broad, and general definition of
    what counts as safety. In this article, I argue for an expanded, relational concept of patient safety revolving around experienced
    patient safety. Recognizing safety as vital for all groups of patients, I follow a dialogical, critical-reflexive approach to focus
    on safety in a somatic hospital setting in Denmark as it is experienced by people with lived experience of mental distress. Safety
    in this context is often compromised, contributing to inequity in
    health for people with mental distress. I present and analyze the
    narratives of two experts by experience about their somatic hospital stay. As an analytical approach, I draw on Frank’s dialogical
    narrative analysis together with elements from Bakhtin’s theory
    of dialogue and Foucault’s theory of power/knowledge. Forefronting voices of those rarely asked and seldom heard, dialogical
    narrative analysis provides insight into how “patient safety” is
    enacted through situated negotiations of meaning in the narratives of people with lived experience. The storytellers are continuously struggling to fit in and to be seen as human beings,
    trying to resist public narratives on mental distress that threaten
    to limit their scope of action and who they can become. The discussion highlights how unintended emotional and psychosocial
    harm limit the benefits of patient safety for certain groups in society. In particular, shame, individualized responsibility, and internalized inferiority hinder equity in health. Building on my
    analysis, I suggest a collaborative, participatory approach for coproducing further knowledge through joint analysis with people
    with lived experience and nurses from somatic hospital wards.
    Translated title of the contributionEn Narrativ Rejse i Patientsikkerhedens grænseland: Mod en udvidet, relationel forståelse af sikkerhed
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalQRMH
    Volume7:11496
    Pages (from-to)1-12
    Number of pages12
    Publication statusPublished - 24 Dec 2023

    Keywords

    • disease, health science and nursing
    • inequity
    • mental health service users
    • othering
    • patient safety
    • power
    • shame
    • somatic wards
    • stigma

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Narrative Journey into the Borderland of Patient Safety: Toward an Expanded, Relational Concept of Safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this