Accuracy of a step counter during treadmill and daily life walking by healthy adults and patients with cardiac disease

Background Step counters have been used to observe activity and support physical activity, but there is limited evidence on their accuracy. Objective The purpose was to investigate the step accuracy of the Fitbit Zip (Zip) in healthy adults during treadmill walking and in patients with cardiac disease while hospitalised at home. Methods Twenty healthy adults aged 39±13.79 (mean ±SD) wore four Zips while walking on a treadmill at different speeds (1.7-6.1km/hour), and 24 patients with cardiac disease (age 67±10.03) wore a Zip for 24hours during hospitalisation and for 4weeks thereafter at home. A Shimmer3 device was used as a criterion standard. Results At a treadmill speed of 3.6km/hour, the relative error (±SD) for the Zips on the upper body was-0.02±0.67 on the right side and-0.09 (0.67) on the left side. For the Zips on the waist, this was 0.08±0.71 for the right side and-0.08 (0.47) on the left side. At a treadmill speed of 3.6km/hour and higher, the average per cent of relative error was <3%. The 24-hour test for the hospitalised patients showed a relative error of-47.15±24.11 (interclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.60), and for the 24-hour test at home, the relative error was-27.51±28.78 (ICC: 0.87). Thus, none of the 24-hour tests had less than the expected 20% error. In time periods of evident walking during the 24h test, the Zip had an average per cent relative error of <3% at 3.6km/hour and higher speeds. Conclusions A speed of 3.6km/hour or higher is required to expect acceptable accuracy in step measurement using a Zip, on a treadmill and in real life. Inaccuracies are directly related to slow speeds, which might be a problem for patients with cardiac disease who walk at a slow pace.