Barriers to and facilitators for involving clinical staff members in managing patients with musculo-skeletal disorders in general practice – a systematic review

Allan Riis, Camilla Hoffmann Merrild, Josephine Nielsen, Tamana Afzali, Michael Skovdal Rathleff, Cathrine Elgaard Jensen, Janus Laust Thomsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleCommunication

Abstract

In Denmark, musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is the most common reason for consultations in general practice. Despite the high frequency of MSK consultations, patients do not always receive guideline concordant support to self-manage their condition and advice to stay physically active. Clinical staff might be able to assist with this. The aim of this project is to describe the barriers to and the facilitators for involving clinical staff in MSK management in general practice through a systematic review. We found that although physiotherapists possess the necessary skills to deal with MSK pain, they lack the competencies to handle patients with multimorbidity and patients without MSK-related conditions in order to obtain a holistic approach of patients in general practice. Also, nurses need training, especially in delivering basic MSK counselling, which includes advising patients to stay active as well as avoid bedrest and pain killers as stand-alone treatment strategies. Therefore, we conclude that involving physiotherapists and nurses in MSK pain management is believed to increase the quality of MSK care, while the lack of skills to take a holistic view is a perceived barrier. More studies are needed to inform educational programmes for physiotherapists and nurses to manage MSK disorders in general practice.
Original languageEnglish
JournalUCN PERSPEKTIV
Issue number13
Pages (from-to)32-37
Number of pages6
ISSN2446-2977
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Barriers to and facilitators for involving clinical staff members in managing patients with musculo-skeletal disorders in general practice – a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this