Conclusion

Niels Ejersbo, Carsten Greve, Signe Pihl-Thingvad

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Universities can perhaps more accurately be characterized as being “normal public service organizations”; they are “normalized” in the sense that they now look more or less like any organization delivering a public service in a Western European country like Denmark. Performance contracts were introduced, and they were first billed as being about “liberation management” and supporting performance management known within New Public Management (NPM). The big lure of NPM was always that public organizations would be set free, manage their own affairs, and compete in a marketplace for customers and resources. Universities seem to have lost that special ingredient that sets them apart from all other types of organizations delivering public services. Many of the researchers in the empirical material were ignorant of the possibilities of getting rewarded by the universities for their performance. Performance contracts tied the universities to the state, and the governance of universities by the state is intact.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationGoverning the reformed university
    EditorsNiels Ejersbo, Carsten Greve, Signe Pihl-Thingvad
    Number of pages8
    Place of PublicationNew York
    PublisherRoutledge
    Publication date2020
    Pages158-165
    Chapter10
    ISBN (Print)978-1-138-06842-1
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-315-15797-9
    Publication statusPublished - 2020
    SeriesRoutledge Critical Studies in Public Management

    Keywords

    • management, organizational development and innovation

    Cite this