Abstract
This article discusses how residents in a local area contributed to the construction of knowledge in regard to scientific assessments in relation to a fire in a storage dump of burnable waste. Building on analytical concepts primarily from Social Worlds theory as well as some concepts from Actor–Network Theory, the analysis shows how dissent and a number of scientific controversies were initiated by some residents living nearby the waste dump who proved to be excellent network builders and who built a number of alliances with media and independent scientists, thus questioning the authorities’ and their experts’ legitimacy. Furthermore, the situated analysis identifies how a few persons—not very organized—were able to create a debate about scientific matters using their combined resources and strong alliance-building abilities, thus proving that in some cases there is no need for a higher level of organization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Public Understanding of Science |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 303-316 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| ISSN | 0963-6625 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Media, communication and languages
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dioxins are the easiest topic to mention: Resident activists' construction of knowledge about low-level exposure to toxic chemicals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver