TY - GEN
T1 - Feasible ways to Personal Meaning Mapping in out-of-school contexts?
AU - Philipps, Morten Raahauge
AU - Johannsen, Bjørn Friis
AU - Andersen, Thomas Dyreborg
AU - Levinsen, Henrik
AU - Foss, Kristian Kildemoes
N1 - Conference code: 18th
PY - 2019/11/7
Y1 - 2019/11/7
N2 - Though most teachers find formal learning activities an important part of a class visit to a science center, research shows that formal learning is seldom the outcome. Instead, school visits tend to become "soda visits" without preparation and learning goals, and are rarely with explicit connection to the subjects taught back in school. To accommodate these challenges at the science center Experimentarium, a partnership with University College Copenhagen was initiated in 2017. In collaboration, ten Flipped Learning based teaching materials were developed to assist visiting teachers in supporting students’ learning - before, during, and after the visit. To evaluate this intervention, a tool was developed to assess students’ learning outcomes using Personal Meaning Mapping (Falk, Moussouri and Coulson, 1998). This paper investigates and discusses this tool as an effective means for measuring ‘actual learning’ (Bundsgaard and Hansen, 2011) in contexts involving interventions aimed to integrate out-of-school visits with in-school activities. Specifically, a pre- and post-test setup was conducted in order to measure development in students conceptual understanding. Data from students’ Personal Meaning Maps were analysed quantitatively using four defined dimensions for coding: extent, breadth, depth, and mastery. The empirical data were collected from 26 students in the same class, of which 12 provided full data sets. Two central results are presented 1) the data shows development in students learning when engaging in the learning material 2) extent and breadth seem to be able to predict depth and mastery, opening up for adjustments to research method. While Personal Meaning Mapping is rather resource-intensive, and although some of these learning outcomes will remain hidden using this method, we still find it a useful and powerful tool for gaining nuanced insights into the development of students’ conceptual understanding. In conclusion, we offer some suggested modifications to the method to make it more feasible to integrate in out-of-school contexts focussing on formal learning.
AB - Though most teachers find formal learning activities an important part of a class visit to a science center, research shows that formal learning is seldom the outcome. Instead, school visits tend to become "soda visits" without preparation and learning goals, and are rarely with explicit connection to the subjects taught back in school. To accommodate these challenges at the science center Experimentarium, a partnership with University College Copenhagen was initiated in 2017. In collaboration, ten Flipped Learning based teaching materials were developed to assist visiting teachers in supporting students’ learning - before, during, and after the visit. To evaluate this intervention, a tool was developed to assess students’ learning outcomes using Personal Meaning Mapping (Falk, Moussouri and Coulson, 1998). This paper investigates and discusses this tool as an effective means for measuring ‘actual learning’ (Bundsgaard and Hansen, 2011) in contexts involving interventions aimed to integrate out-of-school visits with in-school activities. Specifically, a pre- and post-test setup was conducted in order to measure development in students conceptual understanding. Data from students’ Personal Meaning Maps were analysed quantitatively using four defined dimensions for coding: extent, breadth, depth, and mastery. The empirical data were collected from 26 students in the same class, of which 12 provided full data sets. Two central results are presented 1) the data shows development in students learning when engaging in the learning material 2) extent and breadth seem to be able to predict depth and mastery, opening up for adjustments to research method. While Personal Meaning Mapping is rather resource-intensive, and although some of these learning outcomes will remain hidden using this method, we still find it a useful and powerful tool for gaining nuanced insights into the development of students’ conceptual understanding. In conclusion, we offer some suggested modifications to the method to make it more feasible to integrate in out-of-school contexts focussing on formal learning.
KW - method
KW - theory-practice
KW - blended learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077507463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.34190/EEL.19.147
DO - 10.34190/EEL.19.147
M3 - Conference contribution to proceeding
SN - 9781912764426
SP - 476
EP - 485
BT - Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL 2019
A2 - Ørngreen, Rikke
A2 - Buhl, Mie
A2 - Meyer, Bente
PB - Acpil
T2 - European Conference on e-Learning
Y2 - 7 November 2019 through 8 November 2019
ER -