Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Group-based versus one-to-one occupational therapy to improve ADL ability in people with chronic conditions: a pilot and feasibility RCT of the Go:OT study

  • Parker Instituttet
  • Rødovre Kommune
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • VIA University College
  • Bispebjerg og Frederiksberg Hospital
  • University College of Nothern Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Occupational therapy interventions can improve the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in individuals with chronic conditions. The group-based ADAPT program was developed as an alternative to usual one-to-one occupational therapy (UOT), aiming to enhance ADL ability through structured problem-solving processes and implementation of adaptational strategies. This pilot and feasibility study evaluated the feasibility of delivering ADAPT 3.0 in a municipal setting and informed the design of a future full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS: A two-armed pilot RCT was conducted in a Danish municipality, comparing outcomes of ADAPT 3.0 to UOT. Eligible clients (≥ 18 years, chronic conditions, decreased ADL ability) were randomised to either intervention or control group. Outcomes included recruitment and retention, trial participation, impact on staff, access to UOT documentation, completion of outcome measures, and fidelity to the ADAPT manual. Descriptive statistics, logbook notes, and predefined progression criteria guided the evaluation.

RESULTS: Twelve clients and four ADAPT-trained occupational therapists participated. ADAPT 3.0 was delivered with high fidelity and dose. Most progression criteria were met, including access to UOT documentation and successful delivery of ADAPT 3.0. However, recruitment was slower than anticipated, and clients in the UOT group reported to receive limited trial-related information. Completion rates of follow-up evaluations were acceptable in the ADAPT group but lower in the UOT group. Minor structural and procedural challenges were identified.

CONCLUSION: The study supports the feasibility of delivering ADAPT 3.0 in a municipal setting and progressing to a full-scale RCT. To ensure robust trial conduct, key refinements are needed in recruitment procedures, participant information for the UOT group, and clarity of outcome measures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05775653.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112
JournalPilot and Feasibility Studies
Volume12
Issue number112
Number of pages17
ISSN2055-5784
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2026

Keywords

  • occupational therapy
  • chronically ill
  • rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Group-based versus one-to-one occupational therapy to improve ADL ability in people with chronic conditions: a pilot and feasibility RCT of the Go:OT study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this