Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How can cervical screening meet the needs of vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries: A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries

  • Rikke Buus Bøje
  • , Marc Bardou
  • , Keitly Mensah
  • , Raquel Rico Berrocal
  • , Laura Bonvicini
  • , Giusy Iorio
  • , Noemi Auzzi
  • , Diana Taut
  • , Nicoleta-Monica Pasca
  • , Anna Tisler
  • , Anneli Uusküla
  • , Margarida Teixeira
  • , Joao Firmino-Marchado
  • , Mariana Amorim
  • , Ines Baia
  • , Nuno Lunet
  • , Yulia Panyatova
  • , Tatyana Kotzeva
  • , Irina Todorova
  • , Berit Andersen
  • Pia Kirkegaard
  • Regionshospitalet Randers
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization
  • École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales
  • Epidemiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia
  • Qualitative Research and Citizen Science Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia
  • Osservatorio Nazionale Screening. Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO)
  • Babeș-Bolyai University
  • University of Tartu
  • University of Porto
  • Health Psychology Research Center
  • Aarhus University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: This study explored and compared stakeholder perspectives on enhancements to cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women across seven European countries.
Design: In a series of Collaborative User Boards, stakeholders were invited to collaborate on identifying facilitators to improve cervical cancer screening.
Setting: This study was part of the EU-funded CBIG-SCREEN project, which targets disparities in cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women (www.cbig-screen.eu). Data collection took place in Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania.
Participants: Represented stakeholders at various levels, including user representatives (vulnerable women), healthcare professionals, social workers, programme managers, and decision makers.
Methods: Fourteen meetings lasting two hours each were held in these seven countries between October 2021 and June 2022. The meetings were audio- or video recorded, transcribed, and translated into English for qualitative framework analysis.
Results: We engaged 120 participants in the Collaborative User Boards. Proposed solutions targeted both provider and system levels. In all countries, fostering trusting relationships between vulnerable women and social or healthcare professionals, coupled with community outreach for awareness and access to testing was a consistent recommendation. Participants in Estonia, Denmark, France, Italy, Portugal, and Romania advocated for tailoring healthcare services to meet the unique needs of vulnerable populations through a holistic approach. In Bulgaria and Romania, participants advocated for the need to secure free access, from screening to follow up, and emphasised the need for organised screening with target population screening registries.
Conclusion: The study offers insights into stakeholders' recommendations for enhancing cervical cancer screening services for vulnerable women across seven European countries. Despite variations in the implementation level of population-based screening programmes, the imperative to optimise outreach and proximity work to improve cervical cancer screening resonated across all countries.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere090631
JournalBMJ Open
Volume15
Issue number1
Number of pages9
ISSN2044-6055
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • social work and social conditions
  • inequality
  • minority groups
  • vulnerable women
  • health, nutrition and quality of life
  • cervical cancer screening
  • patient and public involvement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How can cervical screening meet the needs of vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries: A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this