Abstract
Purpose:
The purpose of this paper is to analyze how accounts of costs and accounts of needs are shaped, connected and made durable in the day-to-day practices of welfare professionals.
Design/methodology/approach:
Throughout a year, the author traced the work of connecting costs and needs across and beyond the organizational boundaries of the accounting and child protection departments in a Danish local government. Over the course of the study, accountants realized that the budget was overspent and this, accordingly, gave insights into what was done to make accounts more durable.
Findings:
This paper shows that multiple accountabilities are made possible through the ongoing and practical work of shaping, connecting and making accounts durable. This fragile process fails when connections between separate aspects of organizational work are not made visible.
Research limitations/implications:
This paper attempts to convey the potentials of a symmetrical approach for organizational ethnography. In this way, it does not, for instance, address prevailing budget limits or regimes of cost control.
Originality/value:
Insights into how accounts are shaped into meeting multiple and diverging demands for accountability are rare in both the fields of management accounting as a practice and research on social work practice.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze how accounts of costs and accounts of needs are shaped, connected and made durable in the day-to-day practices of welfare professionals.
Design/methodology/approach:
Throughout a year, the author traced the work of connecting costs and needs across and beyond the organizational boundaries of the accounting and child protection departments in a Danish local government. Over the course of the study, accountants realized that the budget was overspent and this, accordingly, gave insights into what was done to make accounts more durable.
Findings:
This paper shows that multiple accountabilities are made possible through the ongoing and practical work of shaping, connecting and making accounts durable. This fragile process fails when connections between separate aspects of organizational work are not made visible.
Research limitations/implications:
This paper attempts to convey the potentials of a symmetrical approach for organizational ethnography. In this way, it does not, for instance, address prevailing budget limits or regimes of cost control.
Originality/value:
Insights into how accounts are shaped into meeting multiple and diverging demands for accountability are rare in both the fields of management accounting as a practice and research on social work practice.
| Translated title of the contribution | Når professionelle beslutninger gøres klar til regnskab |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Journal | Journal of Organizational Ethnography |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 110-124 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISSN | 2046-6749 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- social work and social conditions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Making professional decisions account-able'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Paper
-
Making decisions accountable: a symmetrical approach to the study of accountability in child protection work
Schrøder, I., 29 Aug 2018.Research output: Contribution to conference without a publisher/journal › Paper › Research › peer-review
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Hybridising accounting and caring: A symmetrical study of how costs and needs are combined in child protection work
Schrøder, I. M. (Principle researcher)
08/05/14 → 16/11/18
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver