Abstract
The way governments set priorities for research and innovation in Europe is changing. The new focus on responsible research and innovation (RRI) emphasises broader inclusion, increased dialogue, and a focus on societal challenges. The case of RESEARCH2015 in Denmark is one of the first European priority-setting processes to incorporate such criteria. This paper develops a theoretical model to explore how RESEARCH2015 contributes to mutual responsiveness among actors, a main objective of RRI. Studying mutual responsiveness means going beyond the often-stated focus on policy impact to look at the creation of trust, interdependence and mutual understanding among participants. The study finds that mutual responsiveness is an important precondition for priority-setting, but that the process's contribution to mutual responsiveness is limited, due to the limited attention to social impacts. Still, the case of RESEARCH2015 shows that mutual responsiveness is a relevant perspective for understanding social impacts in research priority-setting.
| Translated title of the contribution | Nye veje i forskningsprioritering: En undersøgelse af responsivitet i FORSK2015 |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Journal | International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 222 |
| Number of pages | 238 |
| ISSN | 1740-2816 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- innovation
- RRI
- foresight
- priority-setting
- research governance
- responsible reserch and innovation
- responsiveness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'New directions in research priority-setting: examining mutual responsiveness in the case of RESEARCH2015'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver