Abstract
What will become of Rousseau when read in a non-transcendent way, as a line of some of the most prominent
contemporary theorists of the philosophy of education
would suggest as inevitable? To answer this question,
the position and analytical tools of Jacque
s Derrida are clarifi ed, and Rousseau’s “
Émile ou De l’éducation” is
read non-transcendentally, which implies a challenge an
d a deconstruction of the way Rousseau has built the
argument for his educational project. Th
e article concludes with a critical
discussion of its own method, and
challenges the asserted unavoidability of the
deconstructive readings of Rousseau’s text.
contemporary theorists of the philosophy of education
would suggest as inevitable? To answer this question,
the position and analytical tools of Jacque
s Derrida are clarifi ed, and Rousseau’s “
Émile ou De l’éducation” is
read non-transcendentally, which implies a challenge an
d a deconstruction of the way Rousseau has built the
argument for his educational project. Th
e article concludes with a critical
discussion of its own method, and
challenges the asserted unavoidability of the
deconstructive readings of Rousseau’s text.
Original language | Danish |
---|---|
Publication date | 2013 |
Number of pages | 14 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |