Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Strange Brew: Bridging Logics Via Institutional Bricolage and the Reconstitution of Organizational Identity

  • Lærke Højgaard Christiansen
  • , Michael Lounsbury
  • Copenhagen Business School

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer-review

Abstract

How do organizations manage multiple logics in response to institutional complexity? In this paper, we explore how intraorganizational problems related to multiple logics may be addressed via the mechanism of institutional bricolage – where actors inside an organization act as “bricoleurs” to creatively combine elements from different logics into newly designed artifacts. An illustrative case study of a global brewery group’s development of such an artifact – a Responsible Drinking Guide Book – is outlined. We argue that intraorganizational institutional bricolage first requires the problematization of organizational identity followed by a social process involving efforts to renegotiate the organization’s identity in relation to the logics being integrated. We show that in response to growing pressures to be more “responsible,” a group of organizational actors creatively tinkered with and combined elements from social responsibility and market logics by drawing upon extant organizational resources from different times and spaces in an effort to reconstitute their collective organizational identity.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInstitutional Logics in Action: Part B
EditorsMichael Lounsbury, Eva Boxenbaum
Number of pages34
Volume50
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing
Publication date9 Jul 2013
EditionB
Pages199-232
ISBN (Print)9781781909201
ISBN (Electronic)9781781909218
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes
SeriesInstitutional Logics in Action, Part B
Volume39 Part B
ISSN0733-558X

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strange Brew: Bridging Logics Via Institutional Bricolage and the Reconstitution of Organizational Identity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this