TY - JOUR
T1 - Survey of Danish Head and Neck Cancer Patients’ Positions on Personalized Medicine, Gene Tests, and Personalized Follow-Up
AU - Danstrup, Christian Sander
AU - Andersen, Maria
AU - Lundbye-Christensen, Søren
AU - Sommer, Mia
AU - Lyhne, Nina Munk
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/4/11
Y1 - 2024/4/11
N2 - The field of personalized medicine (PM) has grown rapidly because of the “omics revolution”, but PM may be difficult for patients to comprehend. This study sought to explore head and neck cancer (HNC) patients’ positions and knowledge of PM, gene tests, and follow-up and to compare HNC patients’ positions to a sample from a national Danish questionnaire. To do this, patients with prior HNC were invited to participate in a questionnaire. Initial interviews revealed a heterogenic understanding of PM between patients. A total of 226 patients were included in the survey and 177 patients with complete data were included for analysis. Most patients were more positive than negative towards gene tests and gene research (83% and 93%, respectively), but 72% had little or no knowledge of the subject. Almost all patients, 98%, were satisfied with their follow-up. Significantly more patients with HNC were positive towards gene research compared to a sample from a national Danish questionnaire (p < 0.001). Patients with HNC were positive towards gene tests and PM, but patients may not understand or comprehend the information given, and it is important to inform and educate patients and health professionals to establish common ground in PM.
AB - The field of personalized medicine (PM) has grown rapidly because of the “omics revolution”, but PM may be difficult for patients to comprehend. This study sought to explore head and neck cancer (HNC) patients’ positions and knowledge of PM, gene tests, and follow-up and to compare HNC patients’ positions to a sample from a national Danish questionnaire. To do this, patients with prior HNC were invited to participate in a questionnaire. Initial interviews revealed a heterogenic understanding of PM between patients. A total of 226 patients were included in the survey and 177 patients with complete data were included for analysis. Most patients were more positive than negative towards gene tests and gene research (83% and 93%, respectively), but 72% had little or no knowledge of the subject. Almost all patients, 98%, were satisfied with their follow-up. Significantly more patients with HNC were positive towards gene research compared to a sample from a national Danish questionnaire (p < 0.001). Patients with HNC were positive towards gene tests and PM, but patients may not understand or comprehend the information given, and it is important to inform and educate patients and health professionals to establish common ground in PM.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85191741495
U2 - 10.3390/jpm14040404
DO - 10.3390/jpm14040404
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38673031
SN - 2075-4426
VL - 14
JO - Journal of Personalized Medicine
JF - Journal of Personalized Medicine
IS - 4
M1 - 404
ER -