Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The hip hop-gang crime-radicalization nexus, public concerns over a contested subcultural genre, Denmark anno 2025

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

During 2025, Danish hip hop has been at the center of intense public debate. The debate concerns two intersecting axes, which we refer to as the hip hop-gang crime nexus and the hip hop-radicalization nexus. We engage with the debate from a perspective inspired by subcultural theory, moral panic theory, and critical radicalization studies. We first outline a tentative genealogy of the historical intersections between hip hop, gang culture, and radical politics in Denmark, providing a basis for understanding the current conjuncture. We then engage with the hip hop-gang crime nexus and find that while this may in part take the form of a disproportionate moral panic – that can best be explained by the fact that some of the rappers addressed are young black working-class men – public concern cannot be written off as unsubstantiated. Actual gangs are posting rap videos online, which may romanticize gang life. We then engage with the hip hop-radicalization nexus. Here we find that the recent Israeli warfare in Gaza has changed public concern over hip hop and politics. And that articulating solidarity with Gaza in rap is constructed as radical and as something that should be confined. We find this tendency problematic. Our findings raise theoretical questions, insofar as critical, constructivist theoretical perspectives meet their limitations when societal concerns cannot be dismissed as unsubstantiated, as is the case with the hip hop-gang crime nexus.
Original languageEnglish
Article number17416590261461892
JournalCrime, Media, Culture
ISSN1741-6590
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The hip hop-gang crime-radicalization nexus, public concerns over a contested subcultural genre, Denmark anno 2025'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this