TY - CHAP
T1 - Transgressive Practices in Participatory Action Research within the Context of Projects as a System of Governance
T2 - Challenges of the Project Society
AU - Juhlin, Sharmila Maria Holmstrøm
AU - Thingstrup, Signe Hvid
N1 - This article is an appendix to Signe Hvid Thingstrups thesis
PY - 2012/4/4
Y1 - 2012/4/4
N2 - The article explores the notion of “project” in relation to participatoryaction research. When action research as a research practice first came toScandinavia in the sixties, the very concept of project and doing projects wasin itself transgressive. This is no longer the case. Today much working life andsocietal development is organized around projects where goals, practises andcriterion for success are intended to run only for a limited period of time, andwhere project endlessly follows project with the risk of fragmented outlooksas well as outcomes. We will discuss how the widespread institutional and discursivepresence of projects in people’s everyday lives affects the possibilitiesof action research to engage in meaningful democratic and transgressive practiseswith its participants. When does participatory action research become yetanother social technique and when does it have the potential to challenge dominatingsocial hierarchies and contribute to social change? We will discuss thesequestions based on findings from two empirical action research projects fromour own work in the multicultural field. In one project, teachers and researcherengage in the development of multicultural education at a primary school. The 214 other project considers the participation of a group of young ethnic minoritygirls in a multicultural suburban area and has as its aim the development ofdemocratic learning processes and empowerment.
AB - The article explores the notion of “project” in relation to participatoryaction research. When action research as a research practice first came toScandinavia in the sixties, the very concept of project and doing projects wasin itself transgressive. This is no longer the case. Today much working life andsocietal development is organized around projects where goals, practises andcriterion for success are intended to run only for a limited period of time, andwhere project endlessly follows project with the risk of fragmented outlooksas well as outcomes. We will discuss how the widespread institutional and discursivepresence of projects in people’s everyday lives affects the possibilitiesof action research to engage in meaningful democratic and transgressive practiseswith its participants. When does participatory action research become yetanother social technique and when does it have the potential to challenge dominatingsocial hierarchies and contribute to social change? We will discuss thesequestions based on findings from two empirical action research projects fromour own work in the multicultural field. In one project, teachers and researcherengage in the development of multicultural education at a primary school. The 214 other project considers the participation of a group of young ethnic minoritygirls in a multicultural suburban area and has as its aim the development ofdemocratic learning processes and empowerment.
M3 - Contribution to book/anthology
SN - 8791387531
SP - 223
EP - 239
BT - Multikulturel lærerfaglighed som refleksionspraksis
CY - Roskilde Universitet
ER -