Which symptoms pose the highest risk in patients calling for an ambulance? A population-based cohort study from Denmark

Stine Ibsen, Tim Alex Lindskou, Christian H Nickel, Torben Kløjsgård, Erika Christensen, Morten Breinholt Søvsø

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Emergency medical service patients are a vulnerable population and the risk of mortality is considerable. In Denmark, healthcare professionals receive 112-emergency calls and assess the main reason for calling. The main aim was to investigate which of these reasons, i.e. which symptoms or mechanism of injury, contributed to short-term risk of death. Secondary aim was to study 1–30 day-mortality for each symptom/ injury. Methods: Historic population-based cohort study of emergency medical service patients calling 112 in the North Denmark Region between 01.01.2016–31.12.2018. We defined 1-day mortality as death on the same or the following day. The frequency of each symptom and cumulative number of deaths on day 1 and 30 together with 1- and 30-day mortality for each symptom/mechanism of injury is presented in proportions. Poisson regression with robust variance estimation was used to estimate incident rates (IR) of mortality with 95% confidence intervals (CI), crude and age and sex adjusted, mortality rates on day 1 per 100,000 person-year in the population. Results: The five most frequent reasons for calling 112 were “chest pain” (15.9%), “unclear problem” (11.9%), “accidents” (11.2%), “possible stroke” (10.9%), and “breathing difficulties” (8.3%). Four of these contributed to the highest numbers of deaths: “breathing difficulties” (17.2%), “unclear problem” (13.2%), “possible stroke” (8.7%), and “chest pain” (4.7%), all exceeded by “unconscious adult – possible cardiac arrest” (25.3%). Age and sex adjusted IR of mortality per 100,000 person-year was 3.65 (CI 3.01–4.44) for “unconscious adult – possible cardiac arrest” followed by “breathing difficulties” (0.45, CI 0.37–0.54), “unclear problem”(0.30, CI 0.11–0.17), “possible stroke”(0.13, CI 0.11–0.17) and “chest pain”(0.07, CI 0.05–0.09). Conclusion: In terms of risk of death on the same day and the day after the 112-call, “unconscious adult/possible cardiac arrest” was the most deadly symptom, about eight times more deadly than “breathing difficulties”, 12 times more deadly than “unclear problem”, 28 times more deadly than “possible stroke”, and 52 times more deadly than “chest pain”. “Breathing difficulties” and “unclear problem” as presented when calling 112 are among the top three contributing to short term deaths when calling 112, exceeding both stroke symptoms and chest pain.

Translated title of the contributionHvilke symptomer er farligst når patienter ringer efter en ambulance?: A populationsbaseret kohorte studie fra Danmark
Original languageEnglish
Article number59
JournalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Volume29
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
ISSN1757-7241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • disease, health science and nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which symptoms pose the highest risk in patients calling for an ambulance? A population-based cohort study from Denmark'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this